[GH-ISSUE #255] Browser support using OPFS #114

New issue

Open

opened 2026-05-23 08:31:09 -06:00 by gitea-mirror · 0 comments

gitea-mirror commented

2026-05-23 08:31:09 -06:00

Owner

Originally created by @fdx-brenton-sheen on GitHub (Oct 31, 2024).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/appy-one/acebase/issues/255

Just a query / feature suggestion.
RxDB seems to make a big deal about the 'bad performance' of IndexedDB in the browser and have gone as far to add an OPFS based storage backend.

Since AceBase is using it's own file-format with NodeJS I was just wondering if using that format in OPFS is something that is being considered? I am unsure as to if the OPFS capabilities extend far enough to support all the file operations that AceBase may require in order to do so efficiently.

Originally created by @fdx-brenton-sheen on GitHub (Oct 31, 2024). Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/appy-one/acebase/issues/255 Just a query / feature suggestion. RxDB seems to make a big deal about the 'bad performance' of IndexedDB in the browser and have gone as far to add an [OPFS based storage backend](https://rxdb.info/rx-storage-opfs.html). Since AceBase is using it's own file-format with NodeJS I was just wondering if using that format in OPFS is something that is being considered? I am unsure as to if the [OPFS](https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/API/File_System_API/Origin_private_file_system) capabilities extend far enough to support all the file operations that AceBase may require in order to do so efficiently.